×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-level choice experiments. (English) Zbl 1031.62059
Summary: This paper gives constructions for optimal and near-optimal sets of pairs for the estimation of main effects, and for the estimation of main effects and two factor interactions, in forced choice experiments in which all attributes have two levels. The number of pairs in the sets is much smaller than that in previously constructed optimal 2-level choice experiments.

MSC:
62K05 Optimal statistical designs
62J15 Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing
PDF BibTeX Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] van Berkum, E.E.M, Optimal paired comparison designs for factorial and quadratic models, J. statist. plann. inference, 15, 265-278, (1987) · Zbl 0606.62076
[2] van Berkum, E.E.M, Optimal paired comparison designs for factorial experiments, CWI tract, 31, (1987) · Zbl 0614.62096
[3] van Berkum, E.E.M, Reduction of the number of pairs in paired comparison designs and exact designs for quadratic models, Comput. statist. data anal., 8, 93-107, (1989) · Zbl 0721.62072
[4] El-Helbawy, A.T; Ahmed, E.A; Alharbey, A.H, Optimal designs for asymmetrical factorial paired comparison experiments, Comm. statist.—simulation, 23, 663-681, (1994) · Zbl 0825.62058
[5] Grossman, H; Holling, H; Schwabe, R, Advances in optimum experimental design for conjoint analysis and discrete choice models, Econometric models marketing, 16, 91-115, (2002)
[6] Kuhfeld, W.F., 2000. Multinomial Logit, Discrete Choice Modelling. SAS Institute. Available at http://ftp.sas.com/techsup/download/technote/ts621.pdf.
[7] Louviere, J.J., 1988. Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 67. Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, CA.
[8] Louviere, J.J; Woodworth, G, Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experimentsan approach based on aggregated data, J. marketing res., 20, 350-367, (1983)
[9] Louviere, J.J; Hensher, D.A; Swait, J.D, Stated choice methods: analysis and application, (2000), Cambridge University Press Cambridge · Zbl 0992.91002
[10] Mathon, R; Rosa, A, 2-(v,k,λ) designs of small order, (), 3-41 · Zbl 0845.05008
[11] Offen, W.W; Littell, R.C, Design of paired comparison experiments when treatments are levels of a single quantitative variable, J. statist. plann. inference, 15, 331-346, (1987) · Zbl 0603.62086
[12] Roberts, I., 2000. Personal communication.
[13] Severin, V.C., 2000. Comparing statistical efficiency and respondent efficiency in choice experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sydney.
[14] Street, D.J; Bunch, D.S; Moore, B, Optimal designs for 2^{k} paired comparison experiments, Comm. statist.—theory and methods, 30, 2149-2171, (2001) · Zbl 0993.62061
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.