zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures. (English) Zbl 1007.91513
Summary: Two methods are frequently used for modeling the choice among uncertain outcomes: stochastic dominance and mean-risk approaches. The former is based on an axiomatic model of risk-averse preferences but does not provide a convenient computational recipe. The latter quantifies the problem in a lucid form of two criteria with possible trade-off analysis, but cannot model all risk-averse preferences. In particular, if variance is used as a measure of risk, the resulting mean-variance (Markowitz) model is, in general, not consistent with stochastic dominance rules. This paper shows that the standard semideviation (square root of the semivariance) as the risk measure makes the mean-risk model consistent with the second degree stochastic dominance, provided that the trade-off coefficient is bounded by a certain constant. Similar results are obtained for the absolute semideviation, and for the absolute and standard deviations in the case of symmetric or bounded distributions. In the analysis we use a new tool, the outcome-risk diagram, which appears to be particularly useful for comparing uncertain outcomes.

91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)
91B28 Finance etc. (MSC2000)
Full Text: DOI
[1] Bawa, V.S., Stochastic dominance: A research bibliography, Management science, 28, 698-712, (1982) · Zbl 0482.90055
[2] Fishburn, P.C., 1964. Decision and Value Theory, Wiley, New York · Zbl 0149.16203
[3] Fishburn, P.C., Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below target returns, The American economic review, 67, 116-126, (1977)
[4] Fishburn, P.C., Stochastic dominance and moments of distributions, Mathematics of operations research, 5, 94-100, (1980) · Zbl 0434.90014
[5] Hanoch, G.; Levy, H., The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk, Review of economic studies, 36, 335-346, (1969) · Zbl 0184.45202
[6] Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., Pólya, G., 1934. Inequalities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
[7] Kendall, M.G., Stuart, A., 1958. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 1: Distribution Theory, Griffin, London · Zbl 0416.62001
[8] Konno, H.; Yamazaki, H., Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market, Management science, 37, 519-531, (1991)
[9] Levy, H., Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis, Management science, 38, 555-593, (1992) · Zbl 0764.90004
[10] Markowitz, H.M., Portfolio selection, Journal of finance, 7, 77-91, (1952)
[11] Markowitz, H.M., 1959. Portfolio Selection. Wiley, New York
[12] Markowitz, H.M., 1987. Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. Blackwell, Oxford · Zbl 0757.90003
[13] Markowitz, H.M.; Todd, P.; Xu, G.; Yamane, Y., Computation of mean – semivariance efficient sets by the critical line algorithm, Annals of operations research, 45, 307-317, (1993) · Zbl 0785.90017
[14] Porter, R.B., Semivariance and stochastic dominance: A comparison, The American economic review, 64, 200-204, (1974)
[15] Porter, R.B.; Gaumnitz, J.E., Stochastic dominance versus mean – variance portfolio analysis, The American economic review, 62, 438-446, (1972)
[16] Pratt, J.W., Raiffa, H., Schlaifer, R., 1995. Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA · Zbl 1165.62004
[17] Rothschild, M.; Stiglitz, J.E., Increasing risk: I. A definition, Journal of economic theory, 2, 225-243, (1970)
[18] Whitmore, G.A, Findlay, M.C. (Eds.), 1978. Stochastic Dominance: An Approach to Decision-Making Under Risk, Heath, Lexington, MA
[19] Yitzhaki, S., Stochastic dominance, mean variance, and gini’s Mean difference, The American economic review, 72, 178-185, (1982)
[20] Zenios, S.A.; Kang, P., Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization for mortgage-backed securities, Annals of operations research, 45, 433-450, (1993) · Zbl 0800.90049
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.