zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

GMM inference when the number of moment conditions in large. (English) Zbl 0941.62077
Summary: Asymptotic theory typically presumes that the dimensionality of econometric models is independent of the sample size even though this presumption is often quite unrealistic. In GMM estimation, whenever optimal instruments are not available, it can frequently be shown that adding over-identifying restrictions (moment conditions) will increase asymptotic precision. However, the conventional asymptotics which underlies this view insists that the number of moment conditions remains finite even though the number of available moment conditions may grow without bound. We consider the explicit dependence of the number of moment conditions (or instruments), \(q_n\), on the sample size, \(n\), and establish that, under conventional regularity conditions for the estimation of a linear model with general heteroskedasticity, \(q^3_n/n\to 0\) is a sufficient condition for the validity of conventional asymptotic inference about the GMM estimator.

62J05 Linear regression; mixed models
62E20 Asymptotic distribution theory in statistics
62H12 Estimation in multivariate analysis
62P20 Applications of statistics to economics
Full Text: DOI
[1] Anderson, T. G.; Sørenson, B. E.: GMM estimation of a stochastic volatility model: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of business and economic statistics 14, 328-352 (1996)
[2] Andrews, D. W. K.: Asymptotic normality of series estimators for nonparametric and semiparametric regression models. Econometrica 59, 307-346 (1991) · Zbl 0727.62047
[3] Arellano, M.; Bond, S.: Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an applications to employment equations. Review of economic studies 58, 277-297 (1991) · Zbl 0719.62116
[4] Bickel, P. J.: Another look at robustness: A review of reviews and some new developments. Scandinavian journal of statistics 3, 145-168 (1976) · Zbl 0343.62039
[5] Chamberlain, G.: Multivariate regression models for panel data. Journal of econometrics 18, 5-46 (1982) · Zbl 0512.62115
[6] Chamberlain, G., 1984. Panel Data, in: Griliches, Z., Intriligator, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 2. North-Holland, New York. · Zbl 0585.62185
[7] Chamberlain, G.: Asymptotic efficiency in estimation with conditional moment restrictions. Journal of econometrics 34, 305-334 (1987) · Zbl 0618.62040
[8] Christiano, L. J.: Associate editor’s introduction to a special section on small-sample properties of GMM. Journal of business and economic statistics 14, 261 (1996)
[9] Cox, D. D.: Approximation of least squares regression on nested subspaces. Annals of statistics 16, 713-732 (1988) · Zbl 0669.62047
[10] Cragg, J.: More efficient estimation in the presence of heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 51, 751-764 (1983) · Zbl 0513.62069
[11] De Jong, R. M.; Bierens, H. J.: On the limit behavior of a chi-square type test if the number of conditional moments tested approaches infinity. Econometric theory 9, 70-90 (1994)
[12] Donald, S. G.: Inference concerning the number of factors in a multivariate nonparametric relationship. Econometrica 65, 103-132 (1997) · Zbl 0873.62127
[13] Hahn, J.: Efficient estimation of panel data models with sequential moment restrictions. Journal of econometrics 79, 1-21 (1997) · Zbl 0880.62119
[14] Hansen, L. P.; Singleton, K. J.: Generalized instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear rational expectations models. Econometrica 50, 1269-1286 (1982) · Zbl 0497.62098
[15] Hong, Y.; White, H.: Consistent specification testing via nonparametric series regression. Econometrica 63, 1133-1159 (1995) · Zbl 0941.62125
[16] Huber, P. J.: Robust regression, asymptotics, conjectures and Monte-Carlo. Annals of statistics 1, 799-821 (1973) · Zbl 0289.62033
[17] Huber, P.J., 1981. Robust Statistics. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0536.62025
[18] Koenker, R.: Asymptotic theory and econometric practice. Journal of applied econometrics 3, 139-147 (1988)
[19] Koenker, R.; Machado, J. A. F.; Skeels, C.; Welsh, A. H.: Momentary lapses: moment expansions and the robustness of minimum distance estimators. Econometric theory 10, 172-197 (1994)
[20] Koenker, R., Machado, J.A.F., 1998. The Falstaff estimator. Economics Letters, 61, 23–28. · Zbl 0911.90074
[21] Magnus, J.R., Neudecker, H., 1988. Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0651.15001
[22] Mammen, E.: Asymptotics with increasing dimension for robust regression with applications to the bootstrap. The annals of statistics 17, 382-400 (1989) · Zbl 0674.62017
[23] Newey, W. K.: Efficient instrumental variables estimation of nonlinear models. Econometrica 58, 809-837 (1990) · Zbl 0728.62107
[24] Newey, W.K., 1993. Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions. In: G.S. Maddala et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics 11, pp. 419–454, , North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[25] Portnoy, S.: Asymptotic behavior of M-estimators of p regression parameters when p2/n is large II: Consistency. Annals of statistics 12, 1209-1298 (1984) · Zbl 0584.62050
[26] Portnoy, S.: Asymptotic behavior of M-estimators of p regression parameters when p2/n is large II: Normal approximation. Annals of statistics 13, 1403-1417 (1985) · Zbl 0601.62026
[27] Portnoy, S.: A central limit theorem applicable to robust regression estimators. Journal of multivariate analysis 22, 24-50 (1987) · Zbl 0626.62033
[28] Serfling, R., 1980. Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York. · Zbl 0538.62002
[29] Shen, X.; Wong, W. H.: Convergence rates of sieve estimators. Annals of statistics 22, 580-615 (1994) · Zbl 0805.62008
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.