zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Operational dimensioning and tolerancing in progress planning: Setup planning. (English) Zbl 0928.90032
Summary: Operational dimensioning and tolerancing play an important role in process planning. It ensures that resultant part dimensions and tolerances do not exceed specified design values. Tolerance chart analysis is an effective technique for process planners to calculate mean values and tolerances of operational dimensions. However, a tolerance chart can be built only after all the intial engineering decisions have been made concerning the process plan. Specifically, setups and setup datums should be identified. While many researchers focused their attention on tolerance chart analysis, the selection of setups and setup datums (setup planning) was overlooked. No systematic approaches for setup planning can be found in the literature. This paper discusses the importance of setup planning to tolerance control in process planning. A graphical approach is then proposed to generate optimal setup plans based on design tolerance specifications.

90B30 Production models
62N05 Reliability and life testing
Full Text: DOI
[1] DOI: 10.1016/0278-6125(84)90006-2 · doi:10.1016/0278-6125(84)90006-2
[2] DOI: 10.1080/00207548908942569 · doi:10.1080/00207548908942569
[3] Dimensioning and Tolerancing (1982)
[4] Computer-Aided Tolerancing (1989)
[5] BUCKINGHAM E., Dimensions and Tolerances for Mass Production (1954)
[6] CHANG T.-C., Expert Process Planning for Manufacturing (1990)
[7] CHANG T.-C., An Introduction to Automated Process Planning Systems (1985)
[8] DOYLE L. E., Metal Machining (1953)
[9] DONG Z., Manufacturing Review 3 pp 262– (1990)
[10] GADZALA J. L., IT>Dimensional Control in Precision Manufacturing (1959)
[11] EARY D. F., Process Engineering for Manufacturing (1962)
[12] DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61911-8 · doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61911-8
[13] DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61827-7 · doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61827-7
[14] HALEVI G., Process Planning Principles A Logical Approach (1995)
[15] DOI: 10.1080/00207548908942638 · doi:10.1080/00207548908942638
[16] DOI: 10.1007/BF02601517 · doi:10.1007/BF02601517
[17] DOI: 10.1080/00207549308956754 · doi:10.1080/00207549308956754
[18] DOI: 10.1080/00207549308956773 · doi:10.1080/00207549308956773
[19] JOHNSON A. M., In Manufacturing Planning and Estimating Handbook pp 1– (1963)
[20] KAROLIN A. V., Proceedings of the AUTOFACT Conference, MS84–762 (1984)
[21] DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62733-4 · doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62733-4
[22] DOI: 10.1016/0278-6125(89)90033-2 · doi:10.1016/0278-6125(89)90033-2
[23] DOI: 10.1016/0278-6125(90)90054-L · doi:10.1016/0278-6125(90)90054-L
[24] DOI: 10.1007/BF02601622 · doi:10.1007/BF02601622
[25] DOI: 10.1080/00207549308956736 · doi:10.1080/00207549308956736
[26] WADE O. R., Tolerance Control in Design and Manufacturing (1967)
[27] WADE O. R., In Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Handbook, vol. I., Machining pp p2–1 to 2–60– (1983)
[28] WADE O. R., Proceedings of the Pacific Conference on Manufacturing pp 1252– (1990)
[29] WANG H.-P., Computer-Aided Process Planning (1991)
[30] DOI: 10.1016/0736-5845(88)90058-0 · doi:10.1016/0736-5845(88)90058-0
[31] DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60176-0 · doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60176-0
[32] WILSON F. W., Manufacturing Planning and Estimation Handbook (1963)
[33] DOI: 10.1080/00207548808947859 · doi:10.1080/00207548808947859
[34] DOI: 10.1080/00207549208948140 · doi:10.1080/00207549208948140
[35] DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62020-4 · doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62020-4
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.