zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities. (English) Zbl 0880.90019
Summary: When environmental externalities are international – i.e. transfrontier – they must often are multilateral and embody public good characteristics. Improving upon inefficient laissez-faire equilibria requires voluntary cooperation for which the game-theoretic core concept provides optimal outcomes that have interesting properties against free riding. To define the core, however, the characteristic function of the game associated with the economy (which specifies the payoff achievable by each possible coalition of players – here, the countries) must also reflect in each case the behavior of the players which are not members of the coalition. This has been for a long time a disputed issue in the theory of the core of economies with externalities.
Among the several assumptions that can be made as to this behaviour, a plausible one is defined in this paper, for which it is shown that the core of the game is nonempty. The proof is constructive in the sense that it exhibits a strategy (specifying an explicit coordinated abatement policy and including financial transfers) that has the desired property of nondomination by any proper coalition of countries, given the assumed behavior of the other countries. This strategy is also shown to have an equilibrium interpretation in the economic model.

91B60 Trade models
91A40 Other game-theoretic models
91A12 Cooperative games
Full Text: DOI
[1] Barrett S (1990) The problem of global environmental protection. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 6 (1): 68–79 · doi:10.1093/oxrep/6.1.68
[2] Bernheim B.D, Peleg B, Whinston MD (1987) Coalition proof Nash equilibria 1 concepts. Journal of Economic Theory 42: 1–12 · Zbl 0619.90090 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(87)90099-8
[3] Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1993) Strategies for the international protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics 52: 309–328 · doi:10.1016/0047-2727(93)90037-T
[4] Champsaur (1975) How to share the cost of a public good. International Journal of Game Theory 4: 113–129 · Zbl 0318.90012 · doi:10.1007/BF01780629
[5] Chander P (1993) Dynamic procedures and incentives in public good economies. Econometrica 61: 1341–1354 · Zbl 0804.90028 · doi:10.2307/2951645
[6] Chander P, Tulkens H (1991) Strategically stable cost sharing in an economic-ecological negotiation process. CORE Discussion Papern \(\deg\) 9135, revised October 1992, to appear in: Maler KG (Ed.) International environmental problems. A volume sponsored by the European Science Foundation, Kluwer, forthcoming
[7] Chander P, Tulkens H (1992a) Theoretical foundations of negotiations and cost sharing in transfrontier pollution problems. European Economic Review 36 (2/3): 288–299 · doi:10.1016/0014-2921(92)90095-E
[8] Chander P, Tulkens H (1992b) Aspects stratégiques des négociations internationales sur les pollutions transfrontières et du partage des coûts de l’épuration. Revue Economique 43 (4): 769–781 · doi:10.2307/3501842
[9] Chander P, Tulkens H (1995) A core-theoretical solution for the design of cooperative agreements on transfrontier pollution. International Tax and Public Finance 2 (2): 279–294 · doi:10.1007/BF00877502
[10] Foley D (1970) Lindahl solution and the core of an economy with public goods. Econometrica 38: 66–72 · Zbl 0196.23406 · doi:10.2307/1909241
[11] Friedman J (1990) Game theory with applications to economics, second edition. Oxford University Press
[12] Germain M, Toint P, Tulkens H (1996) Calcul économique iteratif pour les negociations internationales sur les pluies acides entre la Finlande, la Russie et l’Estonie. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique (Paris) 43: 101–127
[13] Kaneko M (1977) The ratio equilibria and the core of the voting gameG(N, W) in a public goods economy. Econometrica 45: 1589–1594 · Zbl 0367.90046 · doi:10.2307/1913951
[14] Laffont JJ (1977) Effets externes et théorie économique. Monographies du Séminaire d’Econométrie, Editions du Centre national de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris
[15] Maler KG (1989) The acid rain game. In: Folmer H, Van Ierland E (Eds.) Valuation methods and policy making in environmental economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam: 231–252
[16] Mas-Colell A, Silvestre J (1989) Cost sharing equilibria: A Lindahlian approach. Journal of Economic Theory 47: 329–256 · Zbl 0672.90020 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(89)90019-7
[17] Moulin H (1987) Egalitarian-equivalent cost sharing of a public good. Econometrica 55: 963–976 · Zbl 0619.90004 · doi:10.2307/1911038
[18] Ray D, Vohra R (1993) Equilibrium binding agreements. Working Paper 21, Department of Economics, Boston University, forthcoming in Journal of Economic Theory
[19] Scarf H (1971) On the existence of a cooperative solution for a general class ofN-person games. Journal of Economic Theory 3: 169–181 · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(71)90014-7
[20] Shapley L (1967) On balanced sets and cores. International Journal of Game Theory Quarterly 14: 453–460
[21] Shapley L (1971) Cores of convex games. International Journal of Game Theory 1: 11–26 · Zbl 0222.90054 · doi:10.1007/BF01753431
[22] Shapley L, Shubik M (1969) On the core of an economic system with externalities. American Economic Review LIX: 678–684
[23] Starrett D (1972) A note on externalities and the core. Econometrica 41 (1): 179–183 · doi:10.2307/1913894
[24] Tulkens H (1979) An economic model of international negotiations relating to transfrontier pollution. In: Krippendorff K (Ed.) Communication and control in society. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York: 199–212
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.