×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

The transferable belief model. (English) Zbl 0807.68087
Summary: We describe the transferable belief model, a model for representing quantified beliefs based on belief functions. Beliefs can be held at two levels: (1) a credal level where beliefs are entertained and quantified by belief functions, (2) a pignistic level where beliefs can be used to make decisions and are quantified by probability functions. The relation between the belief function and the probability function when decisions must be made is derived and justified. Four paradigms are analyzed in order to compare Bayesian, upper and lower probability, and the transferable belief approaches.

MSC:
68T30 Knowledge representation
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Aczel, J., ()
[2] Black, P.K., Is Shafer general Bayes?, (), 2-9
[3] (), 103-310
[4] Cox, R.T., Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation, Amer. J. phys., 14, 1-13, (1946) · Zbl 0063.01001
[5] DeGroot, M.H., Optimal statistical decisions, (1970), McGraw-Hill New York · Zbl 0225.62006
[6] Dubois, D.; Garbolino, P.; Kyburg, H.E.; Prade, H.; Smets, P., Quantified uncertainty, J. appl. non-classical logics, 1, 105-197, (1991) · Zbl 0925.03112
[7] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., On several representations of an uncertain body of evidence, (), 167-181
[8] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., Focusing versus updating in belief function theory, () · Zbl 0741.68091
[9] Ekelof, P.O., Rättegång, IV, (1982), Stockholm, 5th ed.
[10] Fisher, R.A., Conclusions fiduciaires, Ann. l’inst. Henri Poincaré, 10, 191-213, (1948)
[11] ()
[12] Giles, R., Foundation for a possibility theory, (), 183-195, 1982
[13] Hacking, I., ()
[14] Hájek, P., Deriving Dempster’s rule, (), 73-75
[15] Halpern, J.Y.; Fagin, R., Two views of belief: belief as generalized probability and belief as evidence, Artif. intell., 54, 275-318, (1992) · Zbl 0762.68055
[16] Hsia, Y.-T., Characterizing belief with minimum commitment, (), 1184-1189 · Zbl 0760.68070
[17] Hunter, D., Dempster-Shafer versus probabilistic logic, (), 22-29
[18] Jaffray, J.Y., Application of linear utility theory for belief functions, (), 1-8
[19] Klawonn, F.; Schwecke, E., On the axiomatic justification of Dempster’s rule of combination, Int. J. intell. syst., 7, 469-478, (1990) · Zbl 0761.68091
[20] Klawonn, F.; Smets, P., The dynamic of belief in the transferable belief model and specialization-generalization matrices, (), 130-137
[21] Kyburg, H.E., Objectives probabilities, (), 902-904
[22] Kyburg, H.E., Bayesian and non-Bayesian evidential updating, Artif. intell., 31, 271-293, (1987) · Zbl 0622.68069
[23] Laskey, K.B., Beliefs in belief functions: an examination of Shafer’s canonical examples, (), 39-46
[24] Levi, I., Consonance, dissonance and evidentiary mechanisms, (), 27-43
[25] Lindley, D.V., The probability approach to the treatment of uncertainty in artificial intelligence and expert systems, Stat. sci., 2, 17-24, (1987) · Zbl 0955.68507
[26] Nguyen, H.T., On random sets and belief functions, J. math. anal. appl., 65, 531-542, (1978) · Zbl 0409.60016
[27] Nguyen, H.T.; Smets, P., On dynamics of cautious belief and conditional objects, Int. J. approx. reasoning, 8, 89-104, (1993) · Zbl 0778.68075
[28] Pearl, J., ()
[29] Pearl, J., Reasoning with belief functions: an analysis of compatibility, Int. J. approx. reasoning, 4, 363-390, (1990) · Zbl 0706.68086
[30] Ramsey, F.P., Truth and probability, (), 61-92 · Zbl 1152.01305
[31] Ruspini, E.H., The logical foundations of evidential reasoning, ()
[32] Saffiotti, A., An AI view of the treatment of uncertainty, Knowl. eng. rev., 2, 75-98, (1988)
[33] Shafer, G., ()
[34] Shafer, G., Perspectives in the theory and practice of belief functions, Int. J. approx. reasoning, 4, 323-362, (1990) · Zbl 0714.62001
[35] Shafer, G.; Shenoy, P.P.; Mellouli, K., Propagating belief functions in qualitative Markov trees, Int. J. approx. reasoning, 1, 349-400, (1987) · Zbl 0641.68158
[36] Shafer, G.; Tversky, A., Languages and designs for probability, Cogn. sci., 9, 309-339, (1985)
[37] Smets, P., Un modèle mathématico-statistique simulant le processus du diagnostic médical, (), Available through University Microfilm International, 30-32 Mortimer Street, London W1N 7RA, Thesis 80-70,003
[38] Smets, P., Upper and lower probability functions versus belief functions, (), 17-21
[39] Smets, P., Belief functions, (), 253-286
[40] Smets, P., The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model, IEEE trans. pattern anal. Mach. intell., 12, 447-458, (1990)
[41] Smets, P., The transferable belief model and possibility theory, (), 215-218
[42] Smets, P., Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty, (), 29-40
[43] Smets, P., The transferable belief model and other interpretations of Dempster-Shafer’s model, ()
[44] Smets, P., Varieties of ignorance, Inf. sci., 57-58, 135-144, (1991)
[45] Smets, P., The nature of the unnormalized beliefs encountered in the transferable belief model, (), 292-297
[46] Smets, P., The transferable belief model and random sets, Int. J. intell. syst., 7, 37-46, (1992) · Zbl 0768.68200
[47] Smets, P., Resolving misunderstandings about belief functions: a response to the many criticisms raised by J. pearl, Int. J. approx. reasoning, 6, 321-344, (1992)
[48] Smets, P., Belief functions: the disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem, Int. J. approx. reasoning, 9, 1-35, (1993) · Zbl 0796.68177
[49] Smets, P., An axiomatic justification for the use of belief function to quantify beliefs, (), 598-603
[50] Smith, C.A.B., Consistency in statistical inference and decision, J. roy. stat. soc. B, 23, 1-37, (1961) · Zbl 0124.09603
[51] Williams, P.M., Discussion, (), 322-352
[52] Wilson, N., Decision making with belief functions and pignistic probabilities, (), 364-371
[53] Wong, S.K.M.; Yao, Y.Y.; Bollmann, P.; Bürger, H.C., Axiomatization of qualitative belief structure, IEEE trans. syst. man cybern., 21, 726-734, (1992) · Zbl 0737.60006
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.