zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Finite-valued algebraic lattices. (English) Zbl 0806.06011
Let \(L\) be a distributive algebraic lattice. Then \(L\) is said to be finite-valued if for every compact element \(c\in L\), the poset of meet- irreducible elements not exceeding \(c\) has finitely many maximal elements. It is a classical result that a bialgebraic (= algebraic and dually algebraic) distributive lattice is finite-valued. The converse does not hold in general [see J. Martinez, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 33, 213-220 (1972; Zbl 0241.06007)].
The principal result of the paper under review says that the converse of the above classical result is possible under some additional assumptions. More precisely, let \(L\) be an algebraic distributive lattice whose compact elements form a sublattice of whose meet-irreducible elements form a root-system. (A root-system is a poset for which the principal order-filter \([p)=\{x\in P\): \(p\leq x\}\) is a chain for all \(p\in P\).) Let \(L\) be finite-valued. Then \(L\) is bialgebraic. As a corollary of this result one can derive the following known theorem [see P. Conrad, Czech. Math. J. 15, 101-123 (1965; Zbl 0135.063)]: The congruence lattice \(\text{Con}(L)\) of an \(l\)-group \(L\) is finite-valued if and only if each positive element of \(L\) is a finite product of pairwise orthogonal elements.

06D20 Heyting algebras (lattice-theoretic aspects)
06F15 Ordered groups
Full Text: DOI
[1] Anderson, M. andFeil, T.,Latice-Ordered Groups. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster-Tokyo, 1988.
[2] BalachandrAN, V. K.,A characterization of ??-rings of subsets. Fund. Math.41 (1954), 38-41. · Zbl 0055.28001
[3] Balbes, R. andDwinger, P.,Distributive Lattices. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, 1974.
[4] Bigard, A., Keimel, K. andWolfenstein, S.,Groupes et Anneaux Reticules (Lecture Notes in Mathematics608), Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1977.
[5] B?chi, J. R.,Representation of complete lattices by sets. Portug. Math.2 (1952), 149-186.
[6] Conrad, P. F.,The lattice of all convex ?-subgroups of a lattice-ordered group. Czech. Math. J.15 (1965), 101-123. · Zbl 0135.06301
[7] Cornish, W. H.,Normal lattices. J. Australian Math. Soc.14 (1972), 200-215. · Zbl 0247.06009 · doi:10.1017/S1446788700010041
[8] Crawley, P. andDilworth, R. P.,Algebraic Theory of Lattices. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1973.
[9] Gratzer, G.,General Lattice Theory. Academic Press, New York, 1978.
[10] Martinez, J.,Unique factorization in partially ordered sets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.33 (1972), 213-220. · Zbl 0241.06007 · doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1972-0292723-5
[11] McKenzie, R. N., McNulty, G. F. andTaylor, W. F.,Algebras, Lattices, Varieties (Volume I). Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Monterey, 1987. · Zbl 0611.08001
[12] Mandelker, M.,Relative annihilators in lattices. Duke Math. J.37 (1970), 377-386. · Zbl 0206.29701 · doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-70-03748-8
[13] Monteiro, A.,V Arithm?tique des filtres et les espaces topologiques. De Segundo Symposium de Mathematicas-Villavicencio, Mendoza; Buenos Aires, 1954, 129-162.
[14] Monteiro, A.,L’Arithm?tique des filtres et les espaces topologiques I?II. Notas de L?gica Matem?tica, Vol. 29-30, 1974.
[15] Raney, G. N.,Completely distributive complete lattices. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.3 (1952), 677-680. · Zbl 0049.30304 · doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1952-0052392-3
[16] Snodgrass, J. T. andTsinakis, C.,The finite basis theorem for relatively normal lattices. Preprint.
[17] Steinberg, S. A.,Finitely-valued f-modules. Pacific J. Math.40 (1972), 723-737. · Zbl 0218.16008
[18] Zaanen, A. C.,Riesz Spaces II. North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York-Oxford, 1983. · Zbl 0519.46001
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.