zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Mean-risk analysis of risk aversion and wealth effects on optimal portfolios with multiple investment opportunities. (English) Zbl 0785.90012
Summary: We first define risk in an axiomatic way and a class of utility functions suitable for the so-called mean-risk analysis. Then, we show that, in a portfolio selection problem with multiple risky investments, an investor who is more risk averse in the Arrow-Pratt sense prefers less risk, in the sense of this paper, with less mean return, and an investor who displays increasing (decreasing) relative risk aversion becomes more conservative (aggresive) as the initial capital increases. The risk aversion effect for diversification on optimal portfolios is also discussed.

91B28 Finance etc. (MSC2000)
91B16 Utility theory
Full Text: DOI
[1] K.J. Arrow,Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Markham, Chicago, 1971).
[2] D.P. Bertsekas, Necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of an optimal portfolio, J. Econ. Theory 8 (1974) 235–247.
[3] E.J. Elton and M.J. Gruber,Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1987).
[4] P.C. Fishburn and R.B. Porter, Optimal portfolios with one safe and one risky asset: Effects of changes in rate of return and risk, Manag. Sci. 22 (1976) 1064–1073. · Zbl 0325.90008
[5] B.V. Gnedenko and A.N. Kolmogorov,Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables (translated from the Russian and annotated by K.L. Chung, with an appendix by J.L. Doob) (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 1954). · Zbl 0056.36001
[6] G. Hanoch and H. Levy, The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk, Rev. Econ. Studies 36 (1969) 335–346. · Zbl 0184.45202
[7] J.E. Ingersoll Jr.,Theory of Financial Decision Making (Rowman and Littlefield, New York, 1987).
[8] I. Jewitt, Risk aversion and the choice between risky prospects: The preservation of comparative statics results, Rev. Econ. Studies 54 (1987) 73–85. · Zbl 0604.90020
[9] I. Jewitt, Choosing between risky prospects: The characterization of comparative statics results, and location independent risk, Manag. Sci. 35 (1989) 60–70. · Zbl 0673.90011
[10] K.G. Kallberg and W.T. Ziemba, Comparison of alternative utility functions in portfolio selection problems, Manag. Sci. 29 (1983) 1257–1276. · Zbl 0526.90010
[11] S. Karlin,Total Positivity, Vol. 1 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1968). · Zbl 0219.47030
[12] M. Kijima and M. Ohnishi, Stochastic dominance by functional characterization approach: Fundamental results and applications, Technical Report No. 92-12, Graduate School of Systems Management, The University of Tsukuba, Tokyo (1992).
[13] D. Kira and W.T. Ziemba, The demand for a risky set, Manag. Sci. 26 (1980) 1158–1165. · Zbl 0447.90003
[14] H. Konno, Piecewise linear risk functions and portfolio optimization, J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 33 (1990) 139–156. · Zbl 0706.90005
[15] H. Konno and H. Yamazaki, A mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market, Manag. Sci. 37 (1991) 519–531.
[16] E. Lehmann, Ordered families of distributions, Ann. Math. Statist. 26 (1955) 399–419. · Zbl 0065.11906
[17] H. Levy, Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis, Manag. Sci. 38 (1992) 555–593. · Zbl 0764.90004
[18] Y. Li and W.T. Ziemba, Characterizations of optimal portfolios by univariate and multivariate risk aversion, Manag. Sci. 35 (1989) 259–269. · Zbl 0671.90004
[19] P.L. McEntire, Portfolio theory for independent assets, Manag. Sci. 30 (1984) 952–963. · Zbl 0551.90003
[20] J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern,Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1953). · Zbl 0053.09303
[21] J.W. Pratt, Risk aversion in the small and the large, Econometrica 32 (1964) 122–136. · Zbl 0132.13906
[22] S.J. Press,Applied Multivariate Analysis (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1972). · Zbl 0276.62051
[23] R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970). · Zbl 0193.18401
[24] S.M. Ross,Stochastic Processes (Wiley, New York, 1983).
[25] M.E. Rubinstein, A comparative statics analysis of risk premiums, J. Bus. 12 (1973) 605–615.
[26] D. Stoyan,Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models (edited with revision by D.J. Daley) (Wiley, Chichester, 1983). · Zbl 0536.60085
[27] W.T. Ziemba, Choosing investments when the returns have stable distributions, in:Mathematical Programming in Theory and Practice, eds. P.L. Hammer and G. Zoutendijk (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974) pp. 443–482.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.