zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Mixing properties and central limit theorem for associated point processes. (English) Zbl 07066237
Summary: Positively (resp. negatively) associated point processes are a class of point processes that induce attraction (resp. inhibition) between the points. As an important example, determinantal point processes (DPPs) are negatively associated. We prove $$\alpha$$-mixing properties for associated spatial point processes by controlling their $$\alpha$$-coefficients in terms of the first two intensity functions. A central limit theorem for functionals of associated point processes is deduced, using both the association and the $$\alpha$$-mixing properties. We discuss in detail the case of DPPs, for which we obtain the limiting distribution of sums, over subsets of close enough points of the process, of any bounded function of the DPP. As an application, we get the asymptotic properties of the parametric two-step estimator of some inhomogeneous DPPs.

MSC:
 60-XX Probability theory and stochastic processes 62-XX Statistics
Full Text:
References:
 [1] Alam, K. and Saxena, K.M.L. (1981). Positive dependence in multivariate distributions. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods10 1183–1196. · Zbl 0471.62045 [2] Bardenet, R. and Hardy, A. (2016). Monte Carlo with determinantal point processes. ArXiv preprint. Available at arXiv:1605.00361. [3] Biscio, C.A.N. and Lavancier, F. (2016). Brillinger mixing of determinantal point processes and statistical applications. Electron. J. Stat.10 582–607. · Zbl 1403.60039 [4] Biscio, C.A.N. and Lavancier, F. (2016). Quantifying repulsiveness of determinantal point processes. Bernoulli22 2001–2028. · Zbl 1343.60058 [5] Biscio, C.A.N., Poinas, A. and Waagepetersen, R. (2018). A note on gaps in proofs of central limit theorems. Statist. Probab. Lett.135 7–10. · Zbl 1392.60027 [6] Błaszczyszyn, B. and Yogeshwaran, D. (2015). Clustering comparison of point processes, with applications to random geometric models. In Stochastic Geometry, Spatial Statistics and Random Fields. Lecture Notes in Math.2120 31–71. Cham: Springer. · Zbl 1328.60122 [7] Bolthausen, E. (1982). On the central limit theorem for stationary mixing random fields. Ann. Probab.10 1047–1050. · Zbl 0496.60020 [8] Bradley, R.C. (2005). Basic properties of strong mixing conditions. A survey and some open questions. Probab. Surv.2 107–144. Update of, and a supplement to, the 1986 original. [9] Bulinski, A. and Shashkin, A. (2007). Limit Theorems for Associated Random Fields and Related Systems. Advanced Series on Statistical Science & Applied Probability10. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Co. Pte. Ltd. · Zbl 1154.60037 [10] Bulinski, A.V. and Shabanovich, È. (1998). Asymptotic behavior of some functionals of positively and negatively dependent random fields. Fundam. Prikl. Mat.4 479–492. · Zbl 0968.60044 [11] Burton, R. and Waymire, E. (1985). Scaling limits for associated random measures. Ann. Probab.13 1267–1278. · Zbl 0579.60039 [12] Daley, D.J. and Vere-Jones, D. (2003). An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Vol. I, 2nd ed. Probability and Its Applications (New York). New York: Springer. Elementary theory and methods. · Zbl 1026.60061 [13] Davydov, J.A. (1968). The convergence of distributions which are generated by stationary random processes. Teor. Veroyatn. Primen.13 730–737. · Zbl 0174.49201 [14] Dellacherie, C. and Meyer, P.-A. (1978). Probabilities and Potential. North-Holland Mathematics Studies29. Amsterdam: North-Holland. [15] Deng, N., Zhou, W. and Haenggi, M. (2015). The Ginibre point process as a model for wireless networks with repulsion. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.1 479–492. [16] Doukhan, P. (1994). Mixing: Properties and Examples. Lecture Notes in Statistics85. New York: Springer. [17] Doukhan, P., Fokianos, K. and Li, X. (2012). On weak dependence conditions: The case of discrete valued processes. Statist. Probab. Lett.82 1941–1948. · Zbl 1254.60036 [18] Doukhan, P. and Louhichi, S. (1999). A new weak dependence condition and applications to moment inequalities. Stochastic Process. Appl.84 313–342. · Zbl 0996.60020 [19] Esary, J.D., Proschan, F. and Walkup, D.W. (1967). Association of random variables, with applications. Ann. Math. Stat.38 1466–1474. · Zbl 0183.21502 [20] Evans, S.N. (1990). Association and random measures. Probab. Theory Related Fields86 1–19. · Zbl 0681.60045 [21] Ghosh, S. (2015). Determinantal processes and completeness of random exponentials: The critical case. Probab. Theory Related Fields163 643–665. · Zbl 1334.60083 [22] Gomez, J.S., Vasseur, A., Vergne, A., Martins, P., Decreusefond, L. and Chen, W. (2015). A case study on regularity in cellular network deployment. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett.4 421–424. [23] Guyon, X. (1995). Random Fields on a Network. Probability and Its Applications (New York). New York: Springer. Modeling, statistics, and applications, Translated from the 1992 French original by Carenne Ludeña. · Zbl 0839.60003 [24] Heinrich, L. (2016). On the strong Brillinger-mixing property of $$\alpha$$-determinantal point processes and some applications. Appl. Math.61 443–461. · Zbl 06644006 [25] Heinrich, L. and Klein, S. (2014). Central limit theorems for empirical product densities of stationary point processes. Stat. Inference Stoch. Process.17 121–138. · Zbl 1306.60008 [26] Hough, J.B., Krishnapur, M., Peres, Y. and Virág, B. (2009). Zeros of Gaussian Analytic Functions and Determinantal Point Processes. University Lecture Series51. Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc. · Zbl 1190.60038 [27] Ibragimov, I.A. and Linnik, Y.V. (1971). Independent and Stationary Sequences of Random Variables. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing. With a supplementary chapter by I.A. Ibragimov and V.V. Petrov, Translation from the Russian edited by J. F. C. Kingman. [28] Jolivet, E. (1981). Central limit theorem and convergence of empirical processes for stationary point processes. In Point Processes and Queuing Problems (Colloq., Keszthely, 1978). Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai24 117–161. Amsterdam: North-Holland. [29] Kulesza, A. and Taskar, B. (2012). Determinantal point process models for machine learning. Found. Trends Mach. Learn.5 123–286. · Zbl 1278.68240 [30] Lavancier, F., Møller, J. and Rubak, E. (2015). Determinantal point process models and statistical inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.77 853–877. · Zbl 1414.62403 [31] Lyons, R. (2014). Determinantal probability: Basic properties and conjectures. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Seoul 2014. Vol. IV 137–161. Seoul: Kyung Moon Sa. · Zbl 1373.60087 [32] Macchi, O. (1975). The coincidence approach to stochastic point processes. Adv. in Appl. Probab.7 83–122. · Zbl 0366.60081 [33] Miyoshi, N. and Shirai, T. (2014). A cellular network model with Ginibre configured base stations. Adv. in Appl. Probab.46 832–845. · Zbl 1330.60066 [34] Møller, J. and Waagepetersen, R.P. (2004). Statistical Inference and Simulation for Spatial Point Processes. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability100. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. [35] Rio, E. (1993). Covariance inequalities for strongly mixing processes. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat.29 587–597. · Zbl 0798.60027 [36] Rosenblatt, M. (1956). A central limit theorem and a strong mixing condition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA42 43–47. · Zbl 0070.13804 [37] Shirai, T. and Takahashi, Y. (2003). Random point fields associated with certain Fredholm determinants. I. Fermion, Poisson and boson point processes. J. Funct. Anal.205 414–463. · Zbl 1051.60052 [38] Soshnikov, A. (2000). Determinantal random point fields. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk55 107–160. [39] Waagepetersen, R. and Guan, Y. (2009). Two-step estimation for inhomogeneous spatial point processes. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol.71 685–702. · Zbl 1250.62047 [40] Yuan, M., Su, C. and Hu, T. (2003). A central limit theorem for random fields of negatively associated processes. J. Theoret. Probab.16 309–323. · Zbl 1023.60029
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.