Experimental designs for drug combination studies.

*(English)*Zbl 06975447Summary: The interest in drug combinations is growing rapidly due to the opportunities they create to increase the therapeutic effect and to reduce the frequency or magnitude of undesirable side effects when single drugs fail to deliver satisfactory results. Considerable effort in studying benefits of the joint action of drugs has been matched by the development of relevant statistical methods and tools for statistical analysis of the data obtained in such studies that allow important statistical assumptions to be taken into account, i.e. the appropriate statistical model and the distribution of the response of interest (e.g. Gaussian, Binomial, Poisson). However, much less attention has been given to the choice of suitable experimental designs for such studies, while only high quality data can ensure that the objectives of the studies will be fulfilled. Methods for construction of such experimental designs which are economical and make most efficient use of the available resources are proposed. It is shown how this can be performed when the distribution of the response is one of those belonging to the exponential family of distributions, and provide specific examples for the most common cases. In addition simple but flexible experimental designs, called ray-contour designs, are proposed. These designs are particularly useful when the use of low or high doses is undesirable and hence a standard statistical analysis of the data is not possible. Useful features of these designs are illustrated with an application in cancer study.

##### MSC:

62 | Statistics |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{B. Almohaimeed} and \textit{A. N. Donev}, Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 71, 1077--1087 (2014; Zbl 06975447)

Full Text:
DOI

##### References:

[1] | Abdelbasit, K. M.; Plackett, R. L., Experimental design for joint action, Biometrics, 38, 171-179, (1982) · Zbl 0479.62062 |

[2] | Atkinson, A. C.; Donev, A. N.; Tobias, R. D., Optimum experimental designs, with SAS, (2007), Oxford University Press · Zbl 1183.62129 |

[3] | Chou, T. C., Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies, Pharmacological Reviews, 58, 621-681, (2006) |

[4] | Chou, T.-C.; Talalay, P., Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors, Advances in Enzyme Regulation, 22, 27-55, (1984) |

[5] | Donev, A. N.; Tobias, R., Optimal serial dilutions designs for drug discovery experiments, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 21, 484-497, (2011) |

[6] | Gennings, C., An efficient experimental design for detecting departure from additivity in mixtures of many chemicals, Toxicology, (1995) |

[7] | Greco, W. R.; Bravo, G.; Parsons, J. C., The search for synergy: a critical review from a response surface perspective, Pharmacological Reviews, 47, 331-385, (1995) |

[8] | Hill, A. V., The combinations of haemoglobin with oxygen and with carbon monoxide, Biochemical Journal, 7, 471-480, (1913) |

[9] | Kiefer, J.; Wolfowitz, J., The equivalence of two extremum problems, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 12, 363-366, (1960) · Zbl 0093.15602 |

[10] | Mantel, N., An experimental design in combination chemotherapy, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 76, 909-931, (1958) |

[11] | McCullagh, P.; Nelder, J. A., Generalized linear models, (1989), Chapman and Hall London · Zbl 0744.62098 |

[12] | Straetemans, R.; O’Brien, T.; Wouters, L.; Dun, J. V.; Janicot, M.; Aerts, M., Design and analysis of drug combination experiments, Biometrical Journal, 47, 3, 299-308, (2005) |

[13] | Tallarida, R. J., Drug synergism and dose-effect data analysis, (2000), Chapman, Hall/CRC |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.