zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Complex coordinate methods for hydrodynamic instabilities and Sturm- Liouville eigenproblems with an interior singularity. (English) Zbl 0631.76038
Calculations of inviscid, linearized waves in fluids are very difficult when a mean wind or current U(y) is included because the differential equation is singular wherever \(U(y)=c\), the phase speed. These “critical latitude”, “critical level”, or “critical point” singularities are particularly severe for Chebyshev methods since these global expansion algorithms are very sensitive to the analytic properties of the solution. A simple remedy is described: by making a change of coordinates \(y=f(x)\), where y is the original variable and x is the new coordinate with f(x) a complex function, one can solve the problem on an arc in the complex plane that makes a wide detour around the singularity. Specific guidelines for choosing f(x) for different problems are given in the text.
Results are impressive: for an eigenvalue problem with a pole in the middle of the original real interval (a “Sturm-Liouville problem of the fourth kind”), just six basis functions suffice to calculate the real and imaginary parts of the lowest eigenvalue to within 1.4%. For strong instability, i.e. modes whose phase speeds have large imaginary parts, the complex mapping is unnecessary because the critical latitudes are complex and distant from the real axis. Even so, the mapping is useful for instability problems because it can be used to make calculations for very slowly growing modes to follow the changes in c right up to the “neutral curve” where the imaginary part of \(c=0\). Although especially valuable for spectral algorithms, the same trick can be applied with finite difference methods also. The main disadvantage of the algorithm is that the eigenfunction must be calculated in a second, separate step, but this is usually a minor flaw in comparison to the complex mapping’s virtues for coping with singular eigenvalue problems.

76E17 Interfacial stability and instability in hydrodynamic stability
76E99 Hydrodynamic stability
Full Text: DOI
[1] Orszag, S.A., J. fluid mech., 50, 689, (1971)
[2] Boyd, J.P.; Christidis, Z.D., Geophys. res. lett., 50, 769, (1982)
[3] Boyd, J.P.; Christidis, Z.D., ()
[4] Boyd, J.P., J. math. phys., 22, 1575, (1981)
[5] Simmons, A.J., Quart. J. roy. meteorol. soc., 102, 595, (1978)
[6] Boyd, J.P., J. atmos. sci., 39, 770, (1982)
[7] Boyd, J.P., J. comput. phys., 45, 43, (1982)
[8] Gottlieb, D.; Orszag, S.A., Numerical analysis of spectral methods: theory and application, (1977), Soc. Ind. Appl. Math Philadelphia
[9] Fox, D.; Parker, L., Chebyshev polynomials in numerical analysis, (1968), Oxford Univ. Press London · Zbl 0153.17502
[10] Boyd, J.P., Mon. wea. rev., 106, 1192, (1978)
[11] Boyd, J.P., J. math. phys., 19, 1445, (1978)
[12] Haltiner, G.; Williams, R.T., Numerical weather prediction and dynamic meteorology, (1980), Wiley New York
[13] de Rivas, E.Kalnay, J. comput. phys., 10, 202, (1972)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.