An incomplete system of modal logic.

*(English)*Zbl 0589.03005The authors present a new system of modal propositional logic, called GH, that is ”incomplete in the following sense: there is a sentence that is not a theorem of GH even though it is valid in every frame in which all theorems of GH are valid”. This result is discussed with regard to the interpretation of ’\(\square '\) as provability. The characteristic axiom of GH may then be read as saying that the sentences which are provably ”equivalent to their own provability are in fact provable”. It is thus a formalized answer to L. Henkin’s question in ”A problem concerning provability” [J. Symb. Logic 17, 160 (1952)], and it is closely related to Löb’s theorem.

Reviewer: W.Lenzen

##### MSC:

03B45 | Modal logic (including the logic of norms) |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{G. Boolos} and \textit{G. Sambin}, J. Philos. Log. 14, 351--358 (1985; Zbl 0589.03005)

Full Text:
DOI

##### References:

[1] | For terminology, nomenclature and notations not defined in this paper, see G. Boolos,The Unprovability of Consistency, Cambridge University Press, 1979, where the system GL is consideredin extenso, along with several other systems of modal propositional logic. |

[2] | R. Magari, ?Primi risultati sulla variet? di Boolos?,Bollentino U.M.I. (6)1-B (1982), 359-367. · Zbl 0487.03039 |

[3] | David Lewis, ?Intensional logics without iterative axioms?,Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1974), 457-466. · Zbl 0296.02014 · doi:10.1007/BF00257488 |

[4] | J. F. A. K. van Benthem, ?Two simple incomplete modal logics?,Theoria 44 (1978), 25-37, and ?Syntactic aspects of modal incompleteness theorems?,Theoria 44 (1979), 63-77. |

[5] | L. Henkin, ?A problem concerning provability?,Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (1952), 160. |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.