×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Leximin and utilitarian rules: A joint characterization. (English) Zbl 0385.90007

MSC:
91B08 Individual preferences
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Arrow, K.J, Social choice and individual values, (1963), Wiley New York · Zbl 0984.91513
[2] Blau, J.H, Arrow’s theorem with weak independence, Economica NS, 38, 413-420, (1971)
[3] d’Aspremont, Cl; Gevers, L, Equity and the informational basis of collective choice, Rev. econ. stud., 44, 199-209, (1977) · Zbl 0376.90008
[4] Debreu, G, Topological methods in cardinal utility theory, () · Zbl 0249.90005
[5] Hammond, P.J, Equity, Arrow’s conditions and rawls’ difference principle, Econometrica, 44, 793-804, (1976) · Zbl 0331.90015
[6] Maskin, E, A theorem on utilitarianism, Rev. econ. stud., (1975)
[7] May, K.O, A set of independent, necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision, Econometrica, 20, 680-684, (1952) · Zbl 0047.38402
[8] Milnor, J, Games against nature, () · Zbl 0058.13702
[9] Rawls, J, A theory of justice, (1971), Harvard Univ. Press Cambridge, Mass, Clarendon, Oxford
[10] Sen, A.K, Collective choice and social welfare, (1970), Holden-Day San Francisco, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh · Zbl 0227.90011
[11] Sen, A.K, Rawls versus bentham: an axiomatic examination of the pure distribution problem, Theory and decision, 6, 301-310, (1974) · Zbl 0283.90002
[12] Sen, A.K, Social choice theory: A re-examination, Econometrica, 45, 53-90, (1977) · Zbl 0353.90001
[13] Sen, A.K; Sen, A.K, Methodology and philosophy of science, (), 7, 243-262, (1976), also in Logic
[14] Strasnick, S, The problem of social choice: arrow to rawls, Philosophy and public affairs, 5, 241-273, (1976)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.