zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Games with imperfectly observable commitment. (English) Zbl 0899.90168
Summary: K. Bagwell [Games Econ. Behav. 8, No. 2, 271-280 (1995; Zbl 0821.90148)] claims that, in models of commitment, “the first-mover advantage is eliminated when there is a slight amount of noise associated with the observation of the first-mover’s selection”. We show that the validity of this claim depends crucially on the restriction to pure strategy equilibria. The game analyzed by Bagwell always has a mixed equilibrium that is close to the Stackelberg equilibrium when the noise is small. Furthermore, an equilibrium selection theory that combines elements from the theory of J. C. Harsanyi and R. Selten [‘A general theory of equilibrium selection in games” (1988; Zbl 0693.90098)] with elements from the theory of J. C. Harsanyi [Games Econ. Behav. 8, No. 1, 91-122 (1995; Zbl 0833.90135)], actually selects his “noisy Stackelberg equilibrium”.

91A05 2-person games
91A65 Hierarchical games (including Stackelberg games)
Full Text: DOI
[1] Bagwell, K., Commitment and observability in games, Games Econ. Behav., 8, 271-280, (1995) · Zbl 0821.90148
[2] Binmore, K., Modelling rational players, Econ. Philos., 3, 179-214, (1987)
[3] B. Chakravorti, Y. Spiegel, 1993, Commitment under Imperfect Observability: Why it is better to have followers who know that they don’t know rather than those who don’t know that they don’t know
[4] E. van Damme, 1995, Strategic Equilibrium, Handbook in Game Theory, III, North Holland, Amsterdam
[5] Harsanyi, J., The tracing procedure: A Bayesian approach to defining a solution forn, Int. J. Game Theory, 4, 61-94, (1975) · Zbl 0319.90078
[6] Harsanyi, J. C., A new look at strategic rationality: at equilibrium selection, risk dominance and payoff dominance, Games Econ. Behav., 8, 91-122, (1995)
[7] Harsanyi, J.; Selten, R., A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, (1988), MIT Press Cambridge · Zbl 0693.90098
[8] Hurkens, S., Learning by forgetful players, Games Econ. Behav., 11, 304-329, (1995) · Zbl 0841.90126
[9] Kalai, E.; Samet, D., Persistent equilibria in strategic games, Int. J. Game Theory, 13, 129-144, (1984) · Zbl 0541.90097
[10] Kohlberg, E.; Mertens, J.-F., On the strategic stability of equilibria, Econometrica, 54, 1003-1039, (1986) · Zbl 0616.90103
[11] Myerson, R. B., Refinements of the Nash equilibrium concept, Int. J. Game Theory, 7, 73-80, (1978) · Zbl 0392.90093
[12] J. F. Nash, 1950, Non-Cooperative Games, Princeton University
[13] Schanuel, S. H.; Simon, L. K.; Zame, W. R., The algebraic geometry of games and the tracing procedure, (Selten, R., Game Equilibrium Models. Vol. 2. Methods, Morals and Markets, (1991), Springer-Verlag New York/Berlin), 9-43 · Zbl 0813.90134
[14] Schelling, T., The Strategy of Conflict, (1960), Harvard Univ. Press Cambridge
[15] Selten, R., Re-examination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, Int. J. Game Theory, 4, 25-55, (1975) · Zbl 0312.90072
[16] Von Stackelberg, H., Marktform und Gleichgewicht, (1934), Springer-Verlag Vienna/Berlin
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.