Comparing system reliabilities with ill-known probabilities.

*(English)*Zbl 1458.93074
Carvalho, Joao Paulo (ed.) et al., Information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems. 16th international conference, IPMU 2016, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, June 20–24, 2016. Proceedings. Part II. Cham: Springer. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 611, 619-629 (2016).

Summary: In reliability analysis, comparing system reliability is an essential task when designing safe systems. When the failure probabilities of the system components (assumed to be independent) are precisely known, this task is relatively simple to achieve, as system reliabilities are precise numbers. When failure probabilities are ill-known (known to lie in an interval) and we want to have guaranteed comparisons (i.e., declare a system more reliable than another when it is for any possible probability value), there are different ways to compare system reliabilities. We explore the computational problems posed by such extensions, providing first insights about their pros and cons.

For the entire collection see [Zbl 1385.68004].

For the entire collection see [Zbl 1385.68004].

##### MSC:

93B51 | Design techniques (robust design, computer-aided design, etc.) |

PDF
BibTeX
XML
Cite

\textit{L. Yu} et al., Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 611, 619--629 (2016; Zbl 1458.93074)

Full Text:
DOI

**OpenURL**

##### References:

[1] | Abdallah, N.B., Destercke, S.: Optimal expert elicitation to reduce intervaluncertainty. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2015, pp. 12-21, 12-16 July, 2015, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2015) |

[2] | Borgonovo, E.: The reliability importance of components and prime implicants in coherent and non-coherent systems including total-order interactions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 204(3), 485-495 (2010) · Zbl 1181.90084 |

[3] | De Figueiredo, L.H., Stolfi, J.: Affine arithmetic: concepts and applications. Numer. Algorithms 37(1-4), 147-158 (2004) · Zbl 1074.65050 |

[4] | Ding, Y., Lisnianski, A.: Fuzzy universal generating functions for multi-state system reliability assessment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159(3), 307-324 (2008) · Zbl 1167.90468 |

[5] | Fortin, J., Dubois, D., Fargier, H.: Gradual numbers and their application to fuzzy interval analysis. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16(2), 388-402 (2008) |

[6] | Kreinovich, V., Lakeyev, A., Rohn, J.: Computational complexity of interval algebraic problems: some are feasible and some are computationally intractable-a survey. Math. Res. 90, 293-306 (1996) · Zbl 0849.65023 |

[7] | Mteza, P.Y.: Bounds for the reliability of binary coherent systems. Ph.D. thesis (2014) |

[8] | Sallak, M., Schon, W., Aguirre, F.: Extended component importance measures considering aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 62(1), 49-65 (2013) |

[9] | Troffaes, M.C., Walter, G., Kelly, D.: A robust bayesian approach to modeling epistemic uncertainty in common-cause failure models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 125, 13-21 (2014) |

This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.