zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Platform competition in peer-to-peer lending considering risk control ability. (English) Zbl 1430.90334
Summary: As a new e-commerce phenomenon in financing, peer to peer (P2P) lending has received increased attention recently. For P2P lending platforms, risk control ability (i.e., the ability to accurately assess and screen borrowers to control the credit risk of loans) is a competitive differentiator. The paper models a three-stage game to investigate optimal risk control ability and corresponding optimal prices of P2P lending platforms under different tariffs and agents’ homing choices. Risk-price coefficients for lenders and borrowers are introduced to measure the impact of risk control ability on prices, where higher risk-price coefficients indicate that prices are more sensitive to risk control ability. Moreover, the paper investigates the role of platforms’ scales in deciding optimal risk control ability, prices and market shares. To our best knowledge, this is the first theoretical paper to study the competition in P2P lending considering risk control ability based on game theory. The analytical results show that: (1) in equilibrium, optimal risk control ability decreases in risk-price coefficients; (2) the risk-price coefficient for lenders contributes less than that for borrowers to optimal risk control ability if some lenders multi-home; (3) smaller platforms have higher risk control ability, prices and attract more borrowers than larger platforms under specific conditions.
90B50 Management decision making, including multiple objectives
91B05 Risk models (general)
90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
91B24 Microeconomic theory (price theory and economic markets)
91A80 Applications of game theory
Full Text: DOI
[1] Armstrong, M., Competition in two-sided markets, The RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 668-691, (2006)
[2] Armstrong, M.; Wright, J., Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts, Economic Theory, 32, 353-380, (2007) · Zbl 1123.91017
[3] Aven, T., Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation, European Journal of Operational Research, 253, 1-13, (2016) · Zbl 1346.91102
[4] Berkovich, E., Search and herding effects in peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from prosper.com, Annals of Finance, 7, 389-405, (2011)
[5] Boudreau, K., Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control, Management Science, 56, 1849-1872, (2010)
[6] Burtch, G.; Ghose, A.; Wattal, S., Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online pro-social lending, MIS Quarterly, 38, 773-794, (2014)
[7] Chakravarty, A. K.; Werner, A. S., Telecom service provider portal: Revenue sharing and outsourcing, European Journal of Operational Research, 215, 289-300, (2011) · Zbl 1237.91066
[8] Chen, D.; Lai, F.; Lin, Z., A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: A lender’s perspective, Information Technology and Management, 15, 239-254, (2014)
[9] Dorfleitner, G.; Priberny, C.; Schuster, S.; Stoiber, J.; Weber, M.; de Castro, I.; Kammler, J., Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending - evidence from two leading european platforms, Journal of Banking and Finance, 64, 169-187, (2016)
[10] Duarte, J.; Siegel, S.; Young, L., Trust and credit: the role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending, Review of Financial Studies, 25, 2455-2484, (2012)
[11] Economides, N.; Katsamakas, E., Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry, Management Science, 52, 1057-1071, (2006)
[12] Emekter, R.; Tu, Y.; Jirasakuldech, B.; Lu, M., Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online peer-to-peer (p2p) lending, Applied Economics, 47, 54-70, (2015)
[13] Gao, G. X.; Fan, Z. P.; Fang, X.; Lim, Y. F., Optimal stackelberg strategies for financing a supply chain through online peer-to-peer lending, European Journal of Operational Research, 267, 585-597, (2018) · Zbl 1403.90111
[14] Guo, Y.; Zhou, W.; Luo, C.; Liu, C.; Xiong, H., Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in p2p lending, European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 417-426, (2016) · Zbl 1346.91250
[15] Hagiu, A.; Spulber, D., First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets, Management Science, 59, 1-43, (2013)
[16] Iyer, R.; Khwaja, A. I.; Luttmer, E. F.P.; Shue, K., Screening peers softly: Inferring the quality of small borrowers, Management Science, 62, 1554-1577, (2016)
[17] Koh, T. K.; Fichman, M., Multihoming users’ preferences for two-sided exchange networks, MIS Quarterly, 38, 977-996, (2014)
[18] Lin, M.; Prabhala, N.; Viswanathan, S., Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending, Management Science, 59, 17-35, (2013)
[19] Markopoulos, P. M.; Hosanagar, K., A model of product design and information disclosure investments, Management Science, 64, 739-759, (2017)
[20] Mild, A.; Waitz, M.; Wöckl, J., How low can you go? - overcoming the inability of lenders to set proper interest rates on unsecured peer-to-peer lending markets, Journal of Business Research, 68, 1291-1305, (2015)
[21] Oliveira, F. S., Strategic procurement in spot and forward markets considering regulation and capacity constraints, European Journal of Operational Research, 261, 540-548, (2017) · Zbl 1403.90154
[22] Paravisini, D.; Rappoport, V.; Ravina, E., Risk aversion and wealth: Evidence from person-to-person lending portfolios, Management Science, 63, 279-297, (2016)
[23] Parker, G. G.; Alstyne, M. W.V., Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design, Management Science, 51, 1494-1504, (2005)
[24] Rochet, J. C.; Tirole, J., Two-sided markets: A progress report, The RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 645-667, (2006)
[25] Roger, G., Two-sided competition with vertical differentiation, Journal of Economics, 120, 193-217, (2017) · Zbl 1402.91311
[26] Verbraken, T.; Bravo, C.; Weber, R.; Baesens, B., Development and application of consumer credit scoring models using profit-based classification measures, European Journal of Operational Research, 238, 505-513, (2014) · Zbl 1338.91146
[27] Wright, J., The determinants of optimal interchange fees in payment systems, Journal of Industrial Economics, 52, 1-26, (2004)
[28] Xing, W.; Wang, S.; Liu, L., Optimal ordering and pricing strategies in the presence of a b2b spot market, European Journal of Operational Research, 221, 87-98, (2012) · Zbl 1253.91181
[29] Yum, H.; Lee, B.; Chae, M., From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 469-483, (2012)
[30] Zhang, J.; Liu, P., Rational herding in microloan markets, Management Science, 58, 892-912, (2012)
[31] Zhang, Z.; Gao, G.; Shi, Y., Credit risk evaluation using multi-criteria optimization classifier with kernel , fuzzification and penalty factors, European Journal of Operational Research, 237, 335-348, (2014) · Zbl 1304.91235
[32] Zhu, F.; Iansiti, M., Entry into platform-based markets, Strategic Management Journal, 33, 88-106, (2012)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.