×

A joint mixed effects dispersion model for menstrual cycle length and time-to-pregnancy. (English) Zbl 1274.62842

Summary: Menstrual cycle patterns are often used as indicators of female fecundity and are associated with hormonally dependent diseases such as breast cancer. A question of considerable interest is in identifying menstrual cycle patterns, and their association with fecundity. A source of data for addressing this question is prospective pregnancy studies that collect detailed information on reproductive aged women. However, methodological challenges exist in ascertaining the association between these two processes as the number of longitudinally measured menstrual cycles is relatively small and informatively censored by time to pregnancy (TTP), as well as the cycle length distribution being highly skewed. We propose a joint modeling approach with a mixed effects dispersion model for the menstrual cycle lengths and a discrete survival model for TTP to address this question. This allows us to assess the effect of important characteristics of menstrual cycle that are associated with fecundity. We are also able to assess the effect of fecundity predictors such as age at menarche, age, and parity on both these processes. An advantage of the proposed approach is the prediction of the TTP, thus allowing us to study the efficacy of menstrual cycle characteristics in predicting fecundity. We analyze two prospective pregnancy studies to illustrate our proposed method by building a model based on the Oxford Conception Study, and predicting for the New York State Angler Cohort Prospective Pregnancy Study. Our analysis has relevant findings for assessing fecundity.

MSC:

62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
92B25 Biological rhythms and synchronization

Software:

LBFGS-B; R
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bortot, Sequential predictions of menstrual cycle lengths, Biostatistics 11 pp 741– (2010) · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxq020
[2] Buck Louis, Reproductive and Perinatal Epidemiology pp 62– (2011) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387902.003.0027
[3] Buck Louis, Polychlorinated biphenyl serum concentrations, lifestyle and time-to-pregnancy, Human Reproduction 24 pp 451– (2009) · doi:10.1093/humrep/den373
[4] Byrd, A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 16 pp 1190– (1995) · Zbl 0836.65080 · doi:10.1137/0916069
[5] Camicioli, Early, untreated Parkinson’s disease patients show reaction time variability, Neuroscience Letters 441 pp 77– (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.06.004
[6] Chiezze, The length and variability of the human menstrual cycle, Journal of the American Medical Association 203 pp 675– (1968)
[7] Colombo, Daily fecundability: First results from a new data base, Demographic Research 3/5 (2000)
[8] Cooper, Long-term effects of reproductive-age menstrual cycle patterns on peri-and postmenopausal fracture risk, American Journal of Epidemiology 145 pp 804– (1997) · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009173
[9] Follmann, An approximate generalized linear model with random effects for informative missing data, Biometrics 51 pp 151– (1995) · Zbl 0825.62607 · doi:10.2307/2533322
[10] Guo, Modeling menstrual cycle length using a mixture distribution, Biostatistics 7 pp 100– (2006) · Zbl 1169.62373 · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxi043
[11] Harlow, An application of longitudinal methods to the analysis of menstrual diary data, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 44 pp 1015– (1991) · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90003-R
[12] Harlow, Analysis of menstrual diary data across the reproductive life span applicability of the bipartite model approach and the importance of within-woman variance, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 pp 722– (2000) · doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00202-4
[13] Hsieh, Joint modeling of survival and longitudinal data: Likelihood approach revisited, Biometrics 62 pp 1037– (2006) · Zbl 1116.62105 · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00570.x
[14] Jensen, Fecundability in relation to body mass and menstrual cycle patterns, Epidemiology 10 pp 422– (1999) · doi:10.1097/00001648-199907000-00014
[15] Lin, Linear mixed models with heterogeneous within-cluster variances, Biometrics 53 pp 910– (1997) · Zbl 0891.62048 · doi:10.2307/2533552
[16] Louis, Stress reduces conception probabilities across the fertile window: evidence in support of relaxation, Fertility and Sterility 95 pp 2184– (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.078
[17] Pyper, The Oxford Conception Study design and recruitment experience, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20 pp 51– (2006) · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00771.x
[18] R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2010)
[19] Rizopoulos, Biometrics 67 pp 819– (2011)
[20] Rizopoulos, Shared parameter models under random effects misspecification, Biometrika 95 pp 63– (2008) · Zbl 1437.62592 · doi:10.1093/biomet/asm087
[21] Scheike, A discrete survival model with random effects: An application to time to pregnancy, Biometrics 53 pp 318– (1997) · Zbl 0874.62135 · doi:10.2307/2533117
[22] Small, Menstrual cycle characteristics: Associations with fertility and spontaneous abortion, Epidemiology 17 pp 52– (2006) · doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000190540.95748.e6
[23] Small, Menstrual cycle variability and the likelihood of achieving pregnancy, Reviews on Environmental Health 25 pp 369– (2010) · doi:10.1515/REVEH.2010.25.4.369
[24] Song, A semiparametric likelihood approach to joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data, Biometrics 58 pp 742– (2002) · Zbl 1210.62132 · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00742.x
[25] Sundaram, Biostatistics (2011)
[26] Tsiatis, Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: An overview, Statistica Sinica 14 pp 809– (2004) · Zbl 1073.62087
[27] Weinstein, Timing of menopause and patterns of menstrual bleeding, American Journal of Epidemiology 158 pp 782– (2003) · doi:10.1093/aje/kwg223
[28] Whelan, Menstrual cycle patterns and risk of breast cancer, American Journal of Epidemiology 140 pp 1081– (1994) · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117208
[29] Wu, Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring by modeling the censoring process, Biometrics 44 pp 175– (1988) · Zbl 0707.62210 · doi:10.2307/2531905
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.