×

A comparison of the imprecise beta class, the randomized play-the-winner rule and the triangular test for clinical trials with binary responses. (English) Zbl 1117.62123

Summary: This paper develops clinical trial designs that compare two treatments with a binary outcome. The imprecise beta class (IBC), a class of beta probability distributions, is used in a robust Bayesian framework to calculate posterior upper and lower expectations for treatment success rates using accumulating data. The posterior expectation for the difference in success rates can be used to decide when there is sufficient evidence for randomized treatment allocation to cease. This design is formally related to the randomized play-the-winner (RPW) design, an adaptive allocation scheme where randomization probabilities are updated sequentially to favour the treatment with the higher observed success rate. A connection is also made between the IBC and the sequential clinical trial design based on the triangular test. Theoretical and simulation results are presented to show that the expected sample sizes on the truly inferior arm are lower using the IBC compared with either the triangular test or the RPW design, and that the IBC performs well against established criteria involving error rates and the expected number of treatment failures.

MSC:

62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
62L05 Sequential statistical design
62F15 Bayesian inference
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Anscombe, Sequential medical trials, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 58 pp 365– (1963) · doi:10.2307/2283272
[2] Armitage, Sequential Medical Trials (1975)
[3] Berger, An overview of robust Bayesian analysis (with discussion), Test. 3 pp 5– (1994) · Zbl 0827.62026 · doi:10.1007/BF02562676
[4] Biswas, A randomized longitudinal play-the-winner design for repeated binary data, Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 46 pp 675– (2004) · Zbl 1061.62174 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.00362.x
[5] Burton, Interpreting the clinical trials of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, Sem. Neonat. 2 pp 69– (1997) · doi:10.1016/S1084-2756(97)80026-7
[6] Coad, The use of the triangular test with response-adaptive treatment allocation, Statist. Med. 24 pp 1483– (2005) · doi:10.1002/sim.2051
[7] Coad, A comparison of the randomized play-the-winner rule and the triangular test for clinical trials with binary responses, Statist. Med. 18 pp 761– (1999) · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990415)18:7<761::AID-SIM78>3.0.CO;2-V
[8] Cornfield, A Bayesian test of some classical hypotheses-with applications to sequential clinical trials, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 61 pp 577– (1966) · doi:10.2307/2282772
[9] Gurrin, Using imprecise probabilities to address the questions of inference and decision in randomised clinical trials, J. Eval. Clin. Prac. 8 pp 255– (2002) · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00358.x
[10] Palmer, Ethics, data-dependent designs, and the strategy of clinical trials: time to start learning as we go?, Statist. Meth. Med. Res. 11 pp 381– (2002) · Zbl 1121.62649 · doi:10.1191/0962280202sm298ra
[11] Robbins, A sequential test for two binomial proportions, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 71 pp 4435– (1974) · Zbl 0308.62077 · doi:10.1073/pnas.71.11.4435
[12] Tamura, A case study of an adaptive clinical trial in the treatment of out-patients with depressive disorder, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 89 pp 768– (1994) · doi:10.2307/2290902
[13] Thompson, On the likelihood that one unknown probability exceeds another in view of the evidence of two samples, Biometrics 25 pp 285– (1933) · JFM 59.1159.03 · doi:10.1093/biomet/25.3-4.285
[14] Wald, Sequential Analysis (1947) · Zbl 0029.15805
[15] Walley, Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities (1991) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7
[16] Walley, Analysis of clinical data using imprecise prior probabilities, The Statistician 45 pp 457– (1996) · doi:10.2307/2988546
[17] Wei, The randomized play-the-winner rule in medical trials, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73 pp 830– (1978) · Zbl 0391.62076 · doi:10.2307/2286290
[18] Whitehead, The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials (1997) · Zbl 0566.62092
[19] Whitehead, A unified theory for sequential clinical trials, Statist. Med. 18 pp 2271– (1999) · doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990915/30)18:17/18<2271::AID-SIM254>3.0.CO;2-Z
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.