×

zbMATH — the first resource for mathematics

Biomechanical aspects of closing approaches in postcarotid endarterectomy. (English) Zbl 1431.92010
Summary: The carotid bifurcation tends to develop atherosclerotic stenoses which might interfere with cerebral blood supply. In cases of arterial blockage, the common clinical solution is to remove the plaque via carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery. Artery closure after surgery using primary closures along the cutting edge might lead to artery narrowing and restrict blood flow. An alternative approach is patch angioplasty which takes longer time and leads to more during-surgery complications. The present study uses numerical methods with fluid-structure interaction (FSI) to explore and compare the two solutions in terms of hemodynamics and stress and strain fields developed in the artery wall.
MSC:
92C10 Biomechanics
92C50 Medical applications (general)
92C35 Physiological flow
PDF BibTeX XML Cite
Full Text: DOI
References:
[1] Collaborators∗, N. A. S. C. E. T., Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis, New England Journal of Medicine, 325, 7, 445-453, (1991)
[2] Lichtman, J. H.; Jones, M. R.; Leifheit, E. C., Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in the US Medicare population, 1999-2014, JAMA, 318, 11, 1035-1046, (2017)
[3] Hsia, D. C.; Moscoe, L. M.; Krushat, W. M., Epidemiology of carotid endarterectomy among Medicare beneficiaries: 1985–1996 update, Stroke, 29, 2, 346-350, (1998)
[4] Hobson, R. W.; Mackey, W. C.; Ascher, E., Management of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 48, 2, 480-486, (2008)
[5] Paraskevas, K. I.; Robertson, V.; Saratzis, A. N.; Naylor, A. R., An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following eversion vs. conventional carotid endarterectomy in randomised controlled trials and observational studies, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 67, 5, 1632, (2018)
[6] Treat-Jacobson, D.; Fitzgerald, K.; Foley, A.; AGACNP, C.; Kohlman-Trigoboff, D., Society for Vascular Nursing Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) Updated Nursing Clinical Practice Guideline, Journal of Vascular Nursing, 35, 2, 90-111, (2017)
[7] Byrne, J.; Feustel, P.; Darling, R. C., Primary closure, routine patching, and eversion endarterectomy: what is the current state of the literature supporting use of these techniques?, Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 20, 4, 226-235, (2007)
[8] Szabó, A.; Brazda, E.; Dósa, E.; Apor, A.; Szabolcs, Z.; Entz, L., Long-term restenosis rate of eversion endarterectomy on the internal carotid artery, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 27, 5, 537-539, (2004)
[9] Clagett, G. P.; Robinowitz, M.; Youkey, J. R., Morphogenesis and clinicopathologic characteristics of recurrent carotid disease, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 3, 1, 10-23, (1986)
[10] Lattimer, C.; Burnand, K., Recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy, British Journal of Surgery, 84, 9, 1206-1219, (1997)
[11] Bond, R.; Rerkasem, K.; Naylor, A.; Aburahma, A.; Rothwell, P., Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 40, 6, 1126-1135, (2004)
[12] Ho, K. J.; Nguyen, L. L.; Menard, M. T., Intermediate-term outcome of carotid endarterectomy with bovine pericardial patch closure compared with Dacron patch and primary closure, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 55, 3, 708-714, (2012)
[13] Maertens, V.; Maertens, H.; Kint, M.; Coucke, C.; Blomme, Y., Complication rate after carotid endarterectomy comparing patch angioplasty and primary closure, Annals of Vascular Surgery, 30, 248-252, (2016)
[14] AbuRahma, A. F.; Robinson, P. A.; Saiedy, S.; Khan, J. H.; Boland, J. P., Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: long-term follow-up, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 27, 2, 222-234, (1998)
[15] AbuRahma, A. F.; Robinson, P. A.; Hannay, R. S.; Hudson, J.; Cutlip, L., Prospective controlled study of carotid endarterectomy with Hemashield patch: is it thrombogenic?, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 35, 3, 167-174, (2001)
[16] Archie, J. P., Carotid endarterectomy saphenous vein patch rupture revisited: selective use on the basis of vein diameter, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 24, 3, 346-352, (1996)
[17] Ito, M.; Niiya, Y.; Uchino, H.; Nakayama, N.; Mabuchi, S.; Houkin, K., Irregular neointimal lining with prominent proliferative activity after carotid patch angioplasty: an autopsy case report, World Neurosurgery, 82, 1–2, 240.e1-240.e6, (2014)
[18] Mannheim, D.; Weller, B.; Vahadim, E.; Karmeli, R., Carotid endarterectomy with a polyurethane patch versus primary closure: a prospective randomized study, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 41, 3, 403-407, (2005)
[19] Al-Rawi, P. G.; Turner, C. L.; Waran, V.; Ng, I.; Kirkpatrick, P. J., A randomized trial of synthetic patch versus direct primary closure in carotid endarterectomy, Neurosurgery, 59, 4, 822-829, (2006)
[20] Rerkasem, K.; Rothwell, P. M., Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, 4, (2009)
[21] Muto, A.; Nishibe, T.; Dardik, H.; Dardik, A., Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: current materials and prospects, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 50, 1, 206-213, (2009)
[22] Kamenskiy, A. V.; MacTaggart, J. N.; Pipinos, I. I.; Gupta, P. K.; Dzenis, Y. A., Hemodynamically motivated choice of patch angioplasty for the performance of carotid endarterectomy, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 41, 2, 263-278, (2013)
[23] Oldenburg, W. A.; Almerey, T.; Selim, M.; Farres, H.; Hakaim, A. G., Durability of carotid endarterectomy with bovine pericardial patch, Annals of Vascular Surgery, 50, 218-224, (2018)
[24] Harrison, G. J.; How, T. V.; Poole, R. J., Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 60, 2, 418-427, (2014)
[25] Guerciotti, B.; Vergara, C.; Azzimonti, L., Computational study of the fluid-dynamics in carotids before and after endarterectomy, Journal of Biomechanics, 49, 1, 26-38, (2016)
[26] Domanin, M.; Bissacco, D.; Le Van, D.; Vergara, C., Computational fluid dynamic comparison between patch-based and primary closure techniques after carotid endarterectomy, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 67, 3, 887-897, (2018)
[27] Ando, J.; Yamamoto, K., Effects of shear stress and stretch on endothelial function, Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 15, 5, 1389-1403, (2011)
[28] Tada, S.; Tarbell, J. M., Oxygen mass transport in a compliant carotid bifurcation model, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 34, 9, 1389-1399, (2006)
[29] Halak, M.; Fajer, S.; Ben-Meir, H.; Loberman, Z.; Weller, B.; Karmeli, R., Neck irradiation: a risk factor for occlusive carotid artery disease, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 23, 4, 299-302, (2002)
[30] Tada, S.; Tarbell, J., A computational study of flow in a compliant carotid bifurcation–stress phase angle correlation with shear stress, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 33, 9, 1202-1212, (2005)
[31] Formaggia, L.; Quarteroni, A.; Veneziani, A., Cardiovascular Mathematics: Modeling and Simulation of the Circulatory System, 1, (2010), Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany
[32] ADINA R&D, I., ADINA Theory and Modeling Guide, (2000), Watertown, MA, USA: ADINA, Watertown, MA, USA
[33] Bathe, K.-J., Finite Element Procedures, (2006), Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
[34] Zhang, H.; Bathe, K.-J., Direct and Iterative Computing of Fluid Flows Fully Coupled with Structures, (2001), Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics
[35] Doyle, M. G.; Tavoularis, S.; Bourgault, Y., Application of Parallel Processing to the Simulation of Heart Mechanics, High Performance Computing Systems and Applications, (2010), Berlin, Germany: Springer, Berlin, Germany
[36] Meirson, T.; Orion, E.; Avrahami, I., Numerical analysis of venous external scaffolding technology for saphenous vein grafts, Journal of Biomechanics, 48, 10, 2090-2095, (2015)
[37] Thubrikar, M. J.; Robicsek, F., Pressure-induced arterial wall stress and atherosclerosis, Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 59, 6, 1594-1603, (1995)
[38] Salzar, R. S.; Thubrikar, M. J.; Eppink, R. T., Pressure-induced mechanical stress in the carotid artery bifurcation: a possible correlation to atherosclerosis, Journal of Biomechanics, 28, 11, 1333-1340, (1995)
[39] Thubrikar, M. J.; Roskelley, S. K.; Eppink, R. T., Study of stress concentration in the walls of the bovine coronary arterial branch, Journal of Biomechanics, 23, 1, 1519-1726, (1990)
[40] Gimbrone, M. A.; Topper, J. N.; Nagel, T.; Anderson, K. R.; Garcia-cardeña, G., Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 902, 1, 230-240, (2000)
[41] Caro, C.; Fitz-Gerald, J.; Schroter, R., Atheroma and arterial wall shear observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
[42] Domanin, M.; Buora, A.; Scardulla, F., Computational fluid-dynamic analysis after carotid endarterectomy: patch graft versus direct suture closure, Annals of Vascular Surgery, 44, 325-335, (2017)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. It attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming the completeness or perfect precision of the matching.